Blog Detail

Steve Schwartz | NYC LSAT Tutor | Manhattan

LSAT tips and tricks from Steve Schwartz, professional LSAT tutor in NYC.

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 20

Posted on Friday November 27th, 2009 at 12:45

Q20= Gamba argues # of votes (sample size) opposing water system is too small to be representative of majority of public opinion. E #LSAT ...
June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 19

Posted on Wednesday November 25th, 2009 at 12:45

Q19=urban groups irrelevant to the argument. choices BCDE all help strengthen the argument, but choice A about urban groups has no effect. A ...
June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 18

Posted on Tuesday November 24th, 2009 at 12:45

Q18=If researchers have big incentive 2disprove hypotheses & if many work for new clim findings, expect them to try disprove global warm. B ...
June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 17

Posted on Monday November 23rd, 2009 at 12:45

Q17=computer experts not qualified to talk about institutions' biggest threats. as far as we know, their expertise is limited to comps. B ...
June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 16

Posted on Friday November 20th, 2009 at 12:45

Q16=ppl must explicitly disagree on point at issue. T&S express opposing opinions on science yielding precise math results being suspect. D ...
June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 15

Posted on Thursday November 19th, 2009 at 12:45

Q15=only necessary to vaccinate every year IF new strain of flu every year. if same flu strain 2 yrs in a row, no need to vaccinate again. D ...

There is no rating for this blog because there are no comments yet.