Discussions

200th Post Today!

Posted by rightcommentary • 5/16/08 • Subscribe to this Discussion [RSS] • Report This Topic

Finished my 200th post today! Since I've been up since March 15 - that means, I'm averaging about 100 posts a month (doesn't feel like that - but I guess it has been about 3/4 a day!)

Number 200:
rightcommentary.com/2008/05/16/if-the-appeasement-shoe-fits/

User Comments

5/16/08

AmyOops

yeah!!

[reply]
5/16/08

ThriftShopRomantic

That's a LOT of work-- a TON of posting. Congratulations to you.

[reply]
5/16/08

Norski

Congrats.

That's a milestone - and a pretty good production rate.

[reply]
5/16/08

timethief

Congrats!

[reply]
5/16/08

Arcticulates

Wow! You've been up since March 15th...You need to get some rest..

Just Kidding!

I have been up since March 30th and I have only 29 posts and I thought that was a lot...Congratulations!

[reply]
5/16/08

linksysone

Wow, no sleep blogger

[reply]
5/16/08

rightcommentary

Yes.. no sleep... in addition to blogging I'm also going to go into the GBWR...

[reply]
5/16/08

Shiley

Wow! congrats!

[reply]
5/16/08

earthlingorgeous

Congrats! You are certified blogaholic!

[reply]
5/16/08

markstoneman

This "appeasement" rhetoric of the right, which you seem to be parroting, demonstrates a disturbing willingness to twist the past to suit political purposes in the present. It's ugly. I don't care if Bush was talking about Obama, Carter, or anyone else. He was making a nonsensical analogy in the hopes of elevating levels of fear.

[reply]
1. 5/16/08
  
  rightcommentary
  
  I'm so surprised you didn't like my post...
  
  But wait I'm shocked there is....
  
  ... oh wait - this is the casino. Nevermind.
  
  Btw - this wasn't about the post per se... just that was #200.
2. 5/16/08
  
  markstoneman
  
  Come on. The linked post was about "appeasement", regardless of what the topic is about. Since you have worked for the Bush administration on detainee issues, I'm not feeling all that much like congratulating you.
  
  And in case others aren't clear about what my problem with appeasement rhetoric is, here: Chamberlain's "appeasement" lay in what he gave away to Hitler in Munich, not any conversation he had with the Nazi government.
  
  It would be interesting to have a debate about how (or how not) to engage Iran. Even Gates talks about doing it. Throwing the "appeasement" label around won't help that debate, though it is fun to see McCain joined so closely to Bush in the media, because it's not good for McCain. Still, appeasement is an easy word to remember. Just repeat it often enough and hope it sticks. Mentally and morally shoddy. But shoddy has got results in the past, so knock yourself out.
5/16/08

Cmcandre

That is an impressive feat. Good luck keeping up the pace.

(Nice layout as well)

[reply]
5/16/08

Anok

Pfft Classic overachiever

[reply]
5/16/08

sellytapgirl

Congrats!

[reply]
5/17/08

OutsideMyBrain

That's great - Now get some sleep!

[reply]
5/17/08

rightcommentary

Can't sleep - clowns will eat me.

[reply]
5/17/08

offendedblogger

Crazy right-winger, don't you know you are offending at a pace that the rest of us can't possibly keep up with?

[reply]
5/17/08

HomeHaven

wow that's amazing! i've done 63 posts in 2 years *blush*.

[reply]
5/17/08

wandadog13

Congrats - it took us a wee bit longer to pass the 200 mark but we did it.

[reply]
5/17/08

jackpayne

Jeez...all you workaholics disgust me. I've been at this nearly a year and I don't think I've passed the 70 mark yet.

[reply]