User Comments

1. 

   9/30/09

   ThriftShopRomantic

   Pretty much.
   
   I've been looking forward to "meh" myself.

   [reply]
   1. 

      9/30/09

      pointlessbanter

      meh is the next stage
   2. 

      9/30/09

      MadameX

      Wait...I'm so confused. Is "meh" the next stage of deterioration, or a step in the right direction?
   3. 

      9/30/09

      siralmo

      that's an interesting point
   4. 

      9/30/09

      ThriftShopRomantic

      I'm looking forward to meh. So meh is at least one increment better than blech.
   5. 

      9/30/09

      siralmo

      i don't know, meh i think is once you're sick of blech and don't really care anymore
   6. 

      9/30/09

      ThriftShopRomantic

      Oh wow. No wonder I'm crabby today then...
      
      I've sunk to post-blech meh.
   7. 

      9/30/09

      MadameX

      I took "blech" to be worse than "meh". "Meh" seems more apathetic to me, whereas "blech" is actively negative.
   8. 

      9/30/09

      pointlessbanter

      "i don't know, meh i think is once you're sick of blech and don't really care anymore"
      
      Exactly.... That is my thought behind it.
2. 

   9/30/09

   DailyBeerReview

   I guess that's an example of "pointless banter"

   [reply]
   1. 

      9/30/09

      pointlessbanter

      wow that was clever
   2. 

      9/30/09

      voodooKobra

      Yeah, it actually was.
3. 

   9/30/09

   gosmelltheflowers

   did I smell onions?

   [reply]
   1. 

      9/30/09

      pointlessbanter

      No I read the first page of threads on here
4. 

   9/30/09

   gosmelltheflowers

   Yup - tis getting a bit banal...

   [reply]
   1. 

      9/30/09

      pointlessbanter

      I make my long awaited return to be greeted with crap... So depressing.
   2. 

      9/30/09

      chrissymarie321

      Looks much the same as the last time I was here
5. 

   9/30/09

   aspotofblog

   Puke.

   [reply]
6. 

   9/30/09

   Deray28

   "I make my long awaited return to be greeted with crap... So depressing."
   
   So you decided to contribute to the crap! Welcome back!

   [reply]
   1. 

      9/30/09

      pointlessbanter

      Anything I say is vastly more entertaining than anything that is currently on the front page.
7. 

   9/30/09

   MissSuzie

   : /

   [reply]
8. 

   9/30/09

   nothingprofound

   Blech, meh, puke. You just can't please some people.

   [reply]
9. 

   9/30/09

   crpitt

   I was thinking Blech when I saw who started this discussion

   [reply]
   1. 

      9/30/09

      pointlessbanter

      Liar.
      
      Wanna make out? My dear....
      
      
   2. 

      9/30/09

      crpitt

      Well I would have until you posted that t-shirt.
   3. 

      9/30/09

      pointlessbanter

      It was worth it.
10. 

    9/30/09

    pointlessbanter

    Wow I figured I would come back and try out the forums and there is an abortion and satan debate right on the front page. And Shiley's life story.
    
    I guess the more things change the more they stay the same. Back to the real world now.

    [reply]
    1. 

       9/30/09

       Shiley

       Rarely do I come here any more. I'm tired of the baiting that's clearly what this is and has always been. "My life story" some of us actually advocate for others with that life story. I'm sorry you have a thing against me. I know I got off on the wrong foot and it is well beyond time to get over it. Now my ignore button is on.
    2. 

       9/30/09

       pointlessbanter

       I'd have to unblock you to read that... meh
    3. 

       9/30/09

       nothingprofound

       What we're you expecting? A discussion on French influences in the novels of Dostoyevsky?
11. 

    9/30/09

    PetLvr

    I used to know the difference between "blech" and "meh" .. but my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
    
    Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.

    [reply]
12. 

    9/30/09

    Arcticulates

    I wonder where sigh... fits in?
    
    
    Sigh...

    [reply]
13. 

    10/01/09

    crazyTsu

    Fart

    [reply]