Discussions
Blog Catalog HQ Of Air Force Cyber Command!
Posted by gtally • 5/15/09 • Subscribe to this Discussion [RSS] • Report This Topic
Topics: air force, blog catalog
It looks like the Air Force's new Cyber Command is moving to San Antonio. Do you think they're going to HQ with Blog Catalog?
www.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/stories/2009/05/11/daily38.html
User Comments
-
-
Wikipedia says it's the Internet equivalent of SAC.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber_Command
I guess this is to prevent online attacks to the country.
-
Go read this www.afcyber.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-080303-054.pdf and see if it helps your question and answer.
The answer is no.-
Out of curiousity, gtally, where did you find the info about the move? Is it of interest? Might also be interested that the official Air Force blog, formally at airforcelive.blogspot.com/, is now located at airforcelive.dodlive.mil/.
The unfortunate thing there is that most people were and are blocked from blogspot, blogger, blog catalog and any other host with the term "blog" in it's content. Which is why my answer was no earlier. -
It's currently on the main page of Google News:
news.google.com/
Look under the U.S. section.
For comedic purposes, I read "San Antonio" and just ran with it.
Do you mean military officials or officials in this new Cyber Command can't have blogs? Or that it is blocked from Google in general?
-
So this raises another question -- what are the military's policies towards active duty personnel registering their blogs on social networking sites such as BlogCatalog, Digg, StumbleUpon, Del.ic.ious, et all, on base or off?
-
I'm ex-Air Force and have my blog listed on www.Military.com, and I have been told my content is questionable. It is also on airforce.togetherweserved.com/ . Because my content is not entirely revolving around the military. My friends can't look at mine while at work.
-
Now you've got me Googling like mad because you piqued my interest. Check this out!
www.globalnerdy.com/2008/12/30/the-air-forces-rules-of-engagement-for-blogg...
The chart on this site is actually a pretty good one for businesses and organizations of all sizes to follow. -
The Air Force has a twitter url. I know facebook and myspace are blocked. My daughter lives on and Air Force base in base housing and the phone/dsl/cable run thru the base, so they get errors when loading. But she goes to friends, off base, and has no problems.
Let me check for actual content blockers.
Do you know why content is blocked?-
I'm assuming it's the old WWII "loose lips sink ships" philosophy. I did a little digging and it looks like Wired just last month wrote an article about the DOD's newly - issued Internet 2.0 policies:
www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/04/wtf-military-we/
Reading this, it sounds like the brass want to use collaborative software like Wikis in an "open source" environment to better leverage everyone's ideas. Also, using sites like FB and twitter could be used not just for PR purposes, but intra-governmental and inter-agency communication.
-
-
I wonder -- I can see a strong defensive need for cyber-security. But if this new command is to work like SAC -- will there be offensive cyber-warfare as well? Will the old Cold War idea of MOD carry over into the Internet world? This could be useful in a monolithic country v. country scenario as a deterrent, but how well would it play out with smaller organizations such as hacker groups or terrorist cells? Will the idea of pre-emptive cyber-warfare come into effect? And how will the military function of this differ from other government agencies already involved in online espionage, i.e. the CIA and NSA?
-
What a mouthful!
There isn't exactly a simple answer. Cyber warfare has been going on for a while now. What better way to learn how to have an offensive effect than by creating defenses against attacks.
Like most aspects of daily life, most depend on computers. The number grows daily with the amount of people that either use the internet socially or for bussiness.
I read a few monthes back that there are 200,000 plus viruses released every day, only about 92% are caught and killed.
"And how will the military function of this differ from other government agencies already involved in online espionage, i.e. the CIA and NSA?"
The military already "operates" under the DOD (Department of Defense). Most government offices run independant of each other. In turn, there is little communication between the different departments. There are things in play as we speak so information can be shared between agencies and the information more easily viewed and traded. -
Yeah, it sounds like inter-agency coordination is a huge part of the DOD's Internet 2.0 strategy, with Hurricane Katrina as the wake up call for improved communications.
But would the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction carry over to cyber-warfare and the Internet? And could this be an effective deterrent? (sorry typed it as MOD above. My bad).
-
-
-
What's the mission of Air Force Cyber Command (AFCYBER)
AFCYBER, officially activated Sept. 17, 2007, will prepare the way for the eventual standup of the Cyber Numbered Air Force, or NAF, which will fall under Air Force Space Command. A NAF dedicated to cyberspace will provide combat-ready forces trained and equipped to conduct sustained cyber operations, fully integrated with air and space operations.
A Cyber NAF under AFSPC enables cross-domain synergy, aligns common technical expertise, and facilitates career development, sustainment and acquisition programs.
Consolidating cyberspace combat forces within a cyber-focused NAF emphasizes their operational nature, establishes a nexus of existing Air Force combat experience in the domain, and allows flexibility for future growth. -
-
Cross-Domain Synergy
Architecture
Content negotiation: Graphics, I18N
libwww: Amaya
XML: MathML, Graphics
Synchronized Multimedia: Style
Technology & Society
Metadata
DSig: Fonts
Experiments with Amaya
Web Accessibility Initiative
Accessibility of HTML, MathML, CSS (Aural)
Experiments in Amaya
(Techie enough for you?)
-
-
The Dark Art of Cyberwar
Are cyberattacks warfare? It’s a lot more complicated than you think.
www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4553&print=1
If you need more links to information in explanations, let me know. -
-
-
So, long story short -- no-one really knows where cyber-warfare is headed, what the international rules of engagement are, when it's espionage or when it's a law-enforcement issue. Is it war? Is it a nuisance or a crime? It's a Brave New World, out there!
-
So I gotta wonder: what are the "Doomsday Scenarios" that various experts are peddling surrounding cyber-warfare? I bet they're not too far off from the massive freak out surrounding Y2K -- malfunctioning nuclear power plants, weapons, power grids, etc. I gotta ask -- could people actually be hurt by cyber-warfare? What's your nightmare scenario surrounding cyber-warfare, either silly or serious?
Add Your Comment
Login to leave a message.






