Discussions
Faith
Posted by angelshair • 11/03/09 • Subscribe to this Discussion [RSS] • Report This Topic
Topics: Faith
I was wondering if it is possible to have faith in something without feeling the need to spread the word.
My question comes from what I read on past forums in BC.
Here is the definition of faith in wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith
Is it faith or religious ideologies that makes believer wanting others to believe as they do.
I personaly believe in something greater than me, but most of the time feel much more closer to atheist than religious people, probably because, while I believe in something, I do not feel that I possess the truth and that I have this mission of spreading it.
User Comments
-
Well...this is what I have to say about that. I don't belive in being self-rightious,or shoving my faith in Jesus Christ down your throat. Now having said that when asked for an opinion on a particular thread such as this one,I have no problem in sharing that my "faith" in Christ is strong and I'm proud of it. Just like the atheists say I don't have "faith" and proud of it. Not to mention a part of my faith is spreading around the message of the glory of GOD. I am not ashamed of it. Just like the atheists aren't ashamed of their message.
-
Thank you for sharing.
It is the part about spreading the message that I do not understand, but this is probably because I am not catholic.
Is spreading the message's part of your faith or asked by your religion? -
-
Faith and works are inseparable. The only way that anyone can be justified in the sight of men and really give evidence of salvation is by their actions. Thus, one can say he has faith, but it is dead without works to back it up. If you say you are saved and continue to do things contrary to the commands and principles contained in the Word of God, then no one is going to believe you.
Faith with works is life--eternal life.
-
Faith is an individual thing and there's no reason to try to force your belief/faith down others throats.
-
-
Yes:-)). But the sad part of the story is that by her fear of loosing or missing her good fortune, she has lost her freedom to act.
-
faith and action do go hand in hand....our message is in our actions, the words can fall dead to the ears of others. Our actions speak volumes though
-
Actions do speak volumes, but are actions justified when they are only motivated by ones faith in something? For example, the 9/11 hijackers had faith in their god, and that faith gave them the strength to act, to deliver a message to the American people through the actions of crashing planes into the twin towers. Were their actions justified by their faith?
"Isn't it rather the case that with God, anything is permissible?" - Christopher Hitchens
Obviously meaning that when people have faith in god, and they believe god is on their side, they can and do use their faith in god to justify just about any action they wish, which is dangerous. Faith in religion as well as in god, has been used to justify female genital mutilation, slavery, suicide bombings, etc...
-
From the religious zealot to the globe-trotting human rights activist, most any contemporary who puts forward a moral stance brandishes Kants categorical moral imperative ("do the other person's good"). Only a true metaphysical (ie first philosophy) quest would enable us to rediscover a notion of good devoid of subjective and moralistic tones.
-
If people had less ideas about what's good and bad, right and wrong, healthy and unhealthy, we'd all be better off. People just want to prove they're special, have something the other person doesn't have- more power, money, intelligence, knowledge, talent, beauty, health, a relationship with God, etc. We're just not simple or humble enough.
Add Your Comment
Login to leave a message.








