Discussions

Glenn Beck continues to perpetuate the "dumb blond" stereotype by presenting a Thomas Paine impersonator who appearently had a better "Stimulus Plan" to help the country forward. I tried watching it on youtube, but only got about halfway through. between the slow downloading on my dial-up internet service, and the agravating ignorance of someone proposing that Mr. Paine (an immigrant from England) being outraged over immigration was just too much to bear.

I was rather suprised that Beck is a Thomas Paine fan, as I had always heard that he was something of a conservative. That little tangent aside, here is a spending plan that Mr. Paine conceived circa 1797. I have included here the first bit, as well as a link to follow for those interested

Agrarian Justice (1797) by Thomas Paine

To preserve the benefits of what is called civilized life, and to remedy at the same time the evil which it has produced, ought to considered as one of the first objects of reformed legislation.

Whether that state that is proudly, perhaps erroneously, called civilization, has most promoted or most injured the general happiness of man is a question that may be strongly contested. On one side, the spectator is dazzled by splendid appearances; on the other, he is shocked by extremes of wretchedness; both of which it has erected. The most affluent and the most miserable of the human race are to be found in the countries that are called civilized.

To understand what the state of society ought to be, it is necessary to have some idea of the natural and primitive state of man; such as it is at this day among the Indians of North America. There is not, in that state, any of those spectacles of human misery which poverty and want present to our eyes in all the towns and streets in Europe.

Poverty, therefore, is a thing created by that which is called civilized life. It exists not in the natural state. On the other hand, the natural state is without those advantages which flow from agriculture, arts, science and manufactures.

The life of an Indian is a continual holiday, compared with the poor of Europe; and, on the other hand it appears to be abject when compared to the rich.

Civilization, therefore, or that which is so-called, has operated two ways: to make one part of society more affluent, and the other more wretched, than would have been the lot of either in a natural state.

It is always possible to go from the natural to the civilized state, but it is never possible to go from the civilized to the natural state. The reason is that man in a natural state, subsisting by hunting, requires ten times the quantity of land to range over to procure himself sustenance, than would support him in a civilized state, where the earth is cultivated.

When, therefore, a country becomes populous by the additional aids of cultivation, art and science, there is a necessity of preserving things in that state; because without it there cannot be sustenance for more, perhaps, than a tenth part of its inhabitants. The thing, therefore, now to be done is to remedy the evils and preserve the benefits that have arisen to society by passing from the natural to that which is called the civilized state.

In taking the matter upon this ground, the first principle of civilization ought to have been, and ought still to be, that the condition of every person born into the world, after a state of civilization commences, ought not to be worse than if he had been born before that period.

But the fact is that the condition of millions, in every country in Europe, is far worse than if they had been born before civilization begin, had been born among the Indians of North America at the present. I will show how this fact has happened.

It is a position not to be controverted that the earth, in its natural, cultivated state was, and ever would have continued to be, the common property of the human race. In that state every man would have been born to property. He would have been a joint life proprietor with rest in the property of the soil, and in all its natural productions, vegetable and animal.

But the earth in its natural state, as before said, is capable of supporting but a small number of inhabitants compared with what it is capable of doing in a cultivated state. And as it is impossible to separate the improvement made by cultivation from the earth itself, upon which that improvement is made, the idea of landed property arose from that parable connection; but it is nevertheless true, that it is the value of the improvement, only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property.

Every proprietor, therefore, of cultivated lands, owes to the community ground-rent (for I know of no better term to express the idea) for the land which he holds; and it is from this ground-rent that the fund prod in this plan is to issue...

for the rest of Agrarian Justice, follow this link:
www.thomaspaine.org/Archives/agjst.html

Who's he going to have on next, Henry George?!

Reply

User Comments

  1. Agit8r
    From Paine's "Age of Reason, part 1" we also get a fantastic quote for any class on 'Intelligent Design':

    "Do we not see a fair creation prepared to receive us the instant we are born — a world furnished to our hands, that cost us nothing? Is it we that light up the sun, that pour down the rain, and fill the earth with abundance? Whether we sleep or wake, the vast machinery of the universe still goes on. Are these things, and the blessings they indicate in future, nothing to us? Can our gross feelings be excited by no other subjects than tragedy and suicide? Or is the gloomy pride of man become so intolerable, that nothing can flatter it but a sacrifice of the Creator?"
  2. Anok
    My brain can't handle such heavy material right now.
    1. Agit8r
      yeah, i might've gotten a bit deep there
    2. Anok
      I haven't had mu nightly pot of coffee yet, either. And I've already answered several e mails regarding theory and ideologies and tenants of anarchist theory and action.

      Must....get...coffee....brain...melting....
    3. Agit8r
      What branch of Anarchism? Trotskyism?

      Don't mind me, just trying to hurt your brain some more.

    4. Anok
      Naughty Agit8r!

      No - just my own particular brand *evil grin*
    5. Agit8r
      Anokism?
    6. Anok
      Sure why not?
    7. Agit8r
      You should write a treatise... oh yeah your blog, huh
    8. Anok
      Eventually a book. Muwahahahahaha I've already got a lot of written, I need to do some editing, though.
  3. Agit8r
    Will you sell it? For... MONEY?!
    1. Anok
      Actually I was really hoping to go for a "guerrilla marketing" scheme, whereby the book would be printed, and secretly dropped off on the tables at bookstores to be taken for free.

      I don't know that I could effectively pull that off, though.
    2. Agit8r
      sorta like those insurgency instructional manuals that Reagan airdropped for would-be contras
    3. Anok
      Yeah, only my material will make sense.
  4. jackpayne
    this guy did a great job of doing Tom Paine. To short-cut the whole thing though--everything that has gone wrong in recent years is all Bush's fault.
    1. Agit8r
      That's why Beck is pushing geoism?
  5. MrCheeseburger
    Is this politics related?
    1. Agit8r
      only if Glenn Beck is "politics related"... is he?
    2. MrCheeseburger
      I have no idea. Who is Glenn Beck? Who is Tom Paine? It's all very confusing to a cheeseburger.
  6. Agit8r
    Glenn Beck is some pallid Faux News personality. Thom Paine was the author of the American Revolutionary War pamphlet "Common Sense" among other fine works. He also took part in the French Revolution as a Girondist Jacobin. Which is of course exactly the sort of ideology that Fox News likes to propagate... NOT
    1. MrCheeseburger
      Well, he certainly deals with politics but is not actually involved in them. I was close.
    2. Agit8r
      I suppose that depends on your definition of involved. He has after all been trying to get angry mobs to "Tea-bag" congress... am I allowed to say that on here?
  7. tinatina
    Glenn Beck is the new Rush Limbaugh. He has many followers here in Texas. I think he's a fake character like Ann Coulter.
    1. Agit8r
      He's not a real blonde... I'm shocked!
  8. Agit8r
    Necropost!

Add Your Comment

Login to leave a message.