Discussions
Way to go England
Posted by pointlessbanter • 2/03/08 • Subscribe to this Discussion [RSS] • Report This Topic
I used to cringe when I would read surveys about how people can't point to Washington on a map or other things like this here in the US.
I have to thank England for letting me know that having complete idiots living amongst us is not just an american thing.... From yahoo.com news:
LONDON (AFP) - Britons are losing their grip on reality, according to a poll out Monday which showed that nearly a quarter think Winston Churchill was a myth while the majority reckon Sherlock Holmes was real.
The survey found that 47 percent thought the 12th century English king Richard the Lionheart was a myth.
And 23 percent thought World War II prime minister Churchill was made up. The same percentage thought Crimean War nurse Florence Nightingale did not actually exist.
Three percent thought Charles Dickens, one of Britain's most famous writers, is a work of fiction himself.
Indian political leader Mahatma Gandhi and Battle of Waterloo victor the Duke of Wellington also appeared in the top 10 of people thought to be myths.
Meanwhile, 58 percent thought Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's fictional detective Holmes actually existed; 33 percent thought the same of W. E. Johns' fictional pilot and adventurer Biggles.
UKTV Gold television surveyed 3,000 people.
User Comments
-
-
-
I'd be interested to know how old the average age of the respondent was. I'm going to go out on a limb and take a wild guess here, but I'm assuming they were teens to early 20s?
-
-
But which 3000 people did they interview?
I went to town near where I live about 12 years ago, I was looking for directions to find a street, the town only has about 7 or 8 streets. I went into a corner shop in the main street and asked a lady what the name of the street was that we were on...and you know what, she had to look in the phone book to find out. Out of curiousity I asked how long she had lived in the town, she said "14 years". I reckon I could find 3000 people that have no idea about anything. But alas, I don't live in England, so it wouldn't be a valid result. -
-
"Charles Dickens was a fictional character"...
Somewhere my Victorian lit professor is hanging his head. -
-
-
I don't think it should matter from where you hail, believing that Mahatma Gandhi, Charles Dickens, and Winston Churchill are fictional characters is sheer ignorance. We're not talking about obscure historical figures, here.
They should have asked about Mother Teresa, while they were at it. What about Richard Nixon? Dostoevsky? Mao Tse-Tung? Pope John Paul III? Ho Chi Minh? Vladimir Putin?
Thanks for posting this, pointlessbanter. It's good to know that idiocy and mental laziness are not confined to the US. I suspected that they were not but it's nice to have proof.-
But what if they are not from that cultural background? There's a lot to catch up on. Not knowing Mahatma Ghandi I think is a bit of a prob, there rest of it is neither here nor there because it's relating to English speaking people and culturally specific. However, for some that is 50 born and bred in that culture not to know that information is a little bit of an issue. But if they are good, kind people it doesn't really matter, especially if they follow the right football team.
-
-
-
I was 'the man on the street once. I had been living in the country for a while, working on building guitars and playing music and generally minding my own business. I went to the city a thousand kilometres away. I was stopped in the street and asked a question by a radio reporter. The guy laughed at me because I didn't know the answer about a particular person, my response was ":who's that?' It turned out that he was talking about a local radio comedian of little value to me. It's easy to poll th wrong person or the right one. I could walk into a pub and ask "How many people drinkl beer everyday?', go home, throw the data into a computer and the result would be 97% of people drink everyday, then go to the yoga school t ask the same question, 100% say 'no' and 43% are not telling the truth.
-
Yes, Acoustic G. And that is EXACTLY why any serious poll/survey must also collect demographic data and what we researchers call "control variables" -- info on the respondent that can be used to filter out, or weight, answers from people who would not be expected to know as much about a topic -- as in your case, where you were not from the community where the question was asked.
Still -- it always astonishes me what people do NOT know (and who does not know it).
-
This just shows you can find fools anywhere. It's not a statement on the UK by any stretch. So they found a sample size of 25% that don't know who Winston Churchill was (or thought he was a myth). I bet a more embarrasing # of our people wouldn't have a clue about F.D.R. Just saying is all.
-
Should this thread not be entitled 'Way to go Britain', as the article in question seems to refer to Britons as opposed to the English specifically.
Honestly. You Americans!
-
-
Add Your Comment
Login to leave a message.
















