Discussions
What books should be banned from libraries?
Posted by F4wrdthnkndad • 10/07/09 • Subscribe to this Discussion [RSS] • Report This Topic
Topics: banned books, children and reading., children's books, family, Parents
My son came home with a list of books the librarian told him were banned in many public libraries. While I'm not supportive of banning books from libraries, I was appalled to hear that "Walter, the farting Dog," is on the banned list. Is a book about a farting dog really that offensive? Even if it is, is that reason enough to stop a kid from reading it?
User Comments
-
None. The only things that should be banned from libraries are flashers and censorship. And I'm not so sure about the flashers.
-
Since starting this discussion, I have learned that the "Captain Underpants" series by Dav Pilkey has been banned in some libraries. Banning books seems pointless because there are enough lousy books that will never get read with or without a ban. Now if they ban "Tropic of Cancer," then I'm just going to stop going to the library.
-
Not a one. It is our right to read what we want. I found Lolita on line PDF and you cant get it here in the US. It is not that bad I mean there are not real details or anything. It is a sad excuse for a book but I wondered why it was banned and had to read it.
-
Nonsense. There are two editions of Lolita available on Amazon.com, and three plus the book on tape at Barnes and Noble.
-
The great thing is looks like you son can see the film instead see www.moviefone.com/movie/walter-the-farting-dog/1420521/main.
I thought we were trying to encourage kids to read more and watch less TV. -
It should be up to the parents to decide whether to let their children read this or that book. But, they should all be in libraries.
Now, banning books from an entire country is absolutely ridiculous! Where does that leave the freedom of speech of the author and the freedom to read whatever we want as adults? -
I'm going to have to agree with the vast majority of people on this post and say no literature should be censored. Admittedly, certain books should be marked in 'adult' sections so kids can't get hold of them, but it seems like a such a travesty that some writers pour hours into their work, only so the public aren't even allowed to consider reading it.
I'm sure people are more than capable of deciding what they do and don't want to read all by themselves.
-Eileen -
-
-
The fact that there is such a list is highly offensive to me. What are we in nazi germany. Do we need the government controlling what we watch, read and say. It is funny, I use the library frequently and I have been frustrated that I am unable to find a lot of the type books I would like to read. Who knows maybe the last one "Mastering the Rockefeller Habits" is too controversial. Ha! Anyhow this is very upsetting that a public library would blacklist any book. It is a sad day in this book readers life.
-
Banning physical books is so “old school”. The real question is should we censor the Internet? Can blogs be dangerous? Do we need a blog police? Actually, if I were in charge I’d ban splogs. The punishment would be to cattle prod sploggers until they quit putting crap in my blog’s comment waiting box for me to delete.
-
It seems like there is a general consensus that books should not be banned in libraries. I find it interesting that so many people can come together around an issue like this, yet I'm pretty sure there would be some nasty fights in a library if one was reading about abortions while the lady next to her was reading What to expect when you're expecting; another reading a bound version of porn magazines next to the guy reading the bible;, another reading about sarah palin next to someone reading about healthcare reform.
Add Your Comment
Login to leave a message.























