Discussions
Why are sex discussions so popular in BC?
Posted by legendarytoby • 8/07/09 • Subscribe to this Discussion [RSS] • Report This Topic
Topics: sex
Have u noticed? And honestly, it scares me
User Comments
-
-
Because you're not supposed to discuss it. It's forbidden fruit. That makes the subject mysterious and compelling and alluring.
-
I'd rather the topic be wide open than closed.
That's the mantra we hear chanted. It's an old one that dates back to the late 1960's. The topic is wide open here and there has been no indication that the situation is going to change anytime soon.
Without doubt, I believe most sex based threads we witness here specifically created to garner attention. Such threads do not interest me and I feel free to say so, even in the face of those who may try to unfairly depict me as a Puritan. -
I wasn't advocating censorship. In any group of adults that meet frequently there will be a tendency to self-censor in order to make room for all. If that doesn't happen then calls to scale it back will be made. It doesn't matter what the subject matter is. That's how groups work.
Speaking of groups, we do have groups at BC and IMO they are under utilized. I believe the reason for that is that threads posted to this forum will draw more attention. As the vast majority of most sex based threads we witness here specifically created to garner attention suggesting they be moved to a group would result in tomato throwing and being labeled as a Puritan so I'm surely not going to suggest that.
In this thread a question was asked and in some case straight answers were given. We all have the option of frequenting other blogging forums if we don't find anything of interest on this board. I exercise that option freely and frequently. -
(1) The only threads I reported were the ones that I sent you and aspotofblog and heads up on in advance of reporting.
(2) My reason for reporting was posted into tour shoutboxes and the thread in question. I believe you will recall that it had to do with BC and Google advertising contract restrictions.
(3) TonyB entered the thread and verified the fact that I made the correct call by reporting the thread to Admin.
Now here's my rhetorical question to you lolita, the reason you are singling me out with regard to reporting is? -
right but the thing is, no one is forcing anyone to read/reply to any thread that they are not interested in. My blog is 100% about my sexual life and relationship. I feel no shame in it and never ask anyone to visit it. if it bothers anyone that i post sex related threads in BC, they know their way to my shoutbox and Admins'! My goal is not to be salacious or outrageous and until i am not having as much fun as i am having now in bc, i am sorry to say that my sex related threads will keep going up!
TT I never single anyone out, here or irl. I have been reading you, Romantic and NP until I found something that interested me and replied to it. my response above is for anyone my threads or comments bother. And I don't care who/when/why I am reported. When my thread gets deleted, I move on to the next. After all, this is just a board and i don't take it seriously.
And TT if you are honest with yourself, you will admit that everyone here knows you for reporting which I don't mind one bit! -
@dbowles
I notice you are not speaking on behalf of yourself alone as you refer to "we". Please do take the time to drop the usernames all of those BC members who have selected you to act as spokeman on their behalf into my shoutbox ASAP.
I'd would like to be accommodating by removing them all from my BC friends, and their blogs ftom my BC favorites at the earliest possible opportunity. So thanks, in advance, for your cooperation. -
I would need way more than 300 characters to fulfill your request, and I also don't have the time to list everyone. It would be safe just to remove every one and then re-add the ones you are sure of.
But I'll go ahead and start by stating, dbowles1017, to the "TimeThief needs to stop acting like a mod" list. -
As I said above I would like to be accommodating and have already accommodated you. I deleted you as a BC friend yesterday so you already have received the BC email notification, unless there was a glitch in the system, or you have your settings adjusted not to receive notifications.
If any other BC members among this clique of "we" that you claim to represent would like me to delete them as BC friends, and their blogs as favorites they can drop a PM into my shoutbox and I'll be glad to accommodate them too.
As far as your allegation goes, I posted into this thread like other members did and shared my opinion. You didn't like what I shared so you resorted to labeling me for sharing of an opinion in conflict with yours in an attempt to intimidate me. Well, it didn't work.
-
-
We want to see how other people do it and we are all intrested in others peoples lives. They have to be better than ours is what every one is thinking.
-
legendarytoby
Why are sex discussions so popular in BC? Have u noticed? And honestly, it scares me.
Yes I've noticed but no it doesn't scare me. The overkill when it comes to the number of sex threads alternatively annoys me or bores me. When I feel that way I simply go to other forums. The bottom line is that I have no interest in the sex lives of others. And, I feel like I'm being bombarded with sexual messages in the media, here, there and everywhere. So if that's the way you feel too then I'm not surprised.
-
-
-
ah, but an experienced partier, not unlike myself
, knows that when the key to finding a quality party hook up is tolet everyone else get wasted and, while still having fun, maintaining a nice happy level of sobriety. Then it's easy to distinguish the drunkasses, pass them up and move on to higher quality prospects.
-
-
I asked myself the same question before i posted what contraception are your using now? www.blogcatalog.com/discuss/entry/what-contraception-are-you-using-now, I am quite sure thats the only way to help people enjoy sex the right way.
-
-
Sex discussions tend to give my hands a break from the mouse and keyboard - especially if the discussion gets erotically heated. Welcome release...uh...relief.
-
-
-
I agree with Time Thief.
I mean, although there's nothing -inherently- dull about sex as a topic of conversation (eros -- not sex exactly -- being the most remarkable and definging aspect of the human soul and all that) I do think discussions about sex tend to reach the trainspotting phase a good 5 seconds after the first overly optimistic ooh-la-la.
If you asked me (which you didn't, but, like I care) to explain this, I'd suggest that the problem is that sex discussions have a tendency to quickly degenerate into the participants congratulating themselves for the enormous courage/frankness/openness/ that was (apparently) required in order to HAVE THE DISCUSSION. But surely it's a good rule that conversations -always- suck once they go down the meta-conversational road of: "ooh, aren't we awesome for talking about this"? I mean, it's all very well to say: "Ah, sex, so...central to most of our lives et cetera." but most sex discussions that I overhear go something liike this:
"So, how about....SEX, huh?"
"Oh, Be-HAVE. It's so - I don't know - NAUGHTY of you to mention it."
"Pretty cool, huh? This whole risky transgrssive thing, not being all hung up about stuff..imagine what, er, very...religious...old... Victorian puritans would have thought about this conversation...They'd be, like, totally scandalisd!"
"Yeah. Hehe. Think of THAT!."
"Lucky we're us instead of boring, old dead people who were all anti-sex."
"Yeah! Whoop. [tumblewees roll by]....[naughtily] otherwise we'd have to spank each other or something!"
"Oh You! With paddles?"
"Grrow!"
[long 'Waiting for Godot' like pause]
"Hey."
"Hey what?
"I'm thinking something."
"I reckon I know what YOU'RE thinking about."
"Oh, you!"
"No, no. It's about...how other people would be all bummed about by the sex part of this discussion. But you know what, dude? if I ever had the opportunity to HAVE sex...I'd be all like: totally, let's do it. Right now. Maybe even with each other. I'd be, like,: hell yeah -- even if I were like REALLY BUSY."
"Me too. And you know what? If someone said: "let's ban sex." (like the government or something) I'd be all like 'nuh-uh' -- I'd be like, "no, actually, let's keep having sex instead...I'm going to, even if you aren't." and if they said "hey, stop talking about sex", I'd be all like, well I'm going to ANYWAY, so there. Then I'd shag something."
"Me too."
"Who, me?"
"Oh, you!" et cetera.
Notice how it's not so much the talking about sex that's the problem as much as it's the talking about talking about sex. Why does A invariably turn into B? -
The answer is actually a simple one really.....
Sex just happens to be the one thing we all do, want to do, some crave, some of us do regularly or wish they did regularly no matter your religious beliefs, nationality race creed or color.
So why not talk about it.
What scares me more is the fact people are afraid to talk about it. -
-
@N.P. I don't remember stipulating that discussions had to be devoid of egotism to be permitted, let alone demanding that they should be such that they could not in anyway be construed as 'emanating from egotism.' That would, indeed, be insane. Also, as you say, it would require universal silence.
But there's still a difference between talking about something and talking about how it's good to talk about something (or even that it's good to be the kind of person who thinks it's good to talk about something.) My point is: you want to talk about sex? Knock yourself out. But why spend time talking about how we're very much in favour of talking about it? Why give ourselves points for being anti-anti sex. The (bizarre) implication is that sex is somehow endangered, as if it's the poor, picked on unpopular kid that might disappear into traumatised silence if it were not for the brave few who were still prepared to speak up for it.
But how is this the case? Sex is everywhere, it continues, it's one of those things that people are good at. It's not endangered, and we're certainly not in any danger of falling silent about it.
On the contrary, c.f. advertising, pornography, sex advice. There's nothing inherently wrong with any of this. And yet, I'm tempted to make the point Michel Foucault made in his "Will to Knowledge" namely that no matter how much we talk about sex, we never stop acting as if our doing so is somehow dangerous, defiant, transgresisve: as if sex had been BANNED across the planet and the Gestapo was about to break down the door of every chatroom, or every bedroom and tell people to put their clothes back on...
Don't you find that...curious?
-Mal. -
Now this is a funny thread for sure. A post i did last month 'Maintaining muscle mass while having sex', got loads of hits, and it still does. Maybe its to do with the whole thing about people thinking about sex every moment of the day. The next post i write is similar in nature (not so much sex), but in general i think it is because sex is still a private thing.
Shaun
Add Your Comment
Login to leave a message.



























