Discussions
Would U Send 100+ Text 2 Ex Per Day?
Posted by AchEmpire • 10/25/09 • Subscribe to this Discussion [RSS] • Report This Topic
Topics: ex
If your ex broke up with you for the 3rd time, and you know each time ex breaks up with you, you know how to "reverse them" by sending 100+ text per day to win them back, and they take you back each time, and you both do "It" when meet to make up would you continue the relationship with all this weirdness or get out asap?
User Comments
-
I would send her a box with dog poo, just to tell her what I think about it.
On my blog I have a link to a company, who send dog poo for you. So you dont have to do the dirty job, you can pay somebody to do it for you.
Dont waste 100 text per day, he is not worthy.-
MrPoo - Have someone else do the "dirty job"?
-
Ha ha.. I wouldn’t mind doing it on my own. But a pretty girl like you shouldn’t touch turd
-
MrPoo - Well thanks for your suggestions about all this.
-
-
Sounds like stalking to me! 8-)-
exit2013 - Nothing stalking about any of this.
-
-
I would never be in a situation where I had to break up with some one for the third time.-
dbowles1017 - Well if the love and passion was invloved you wouldn't have a choice.
-
No. Three times means you are an idiot
-
dbowles1017 - Who the ex or her?
-
amen - i break up once and for all one time. There are no second, third, fourth chances because what was broken the first time will continue to be broken. -
sjtavo - So are you saying the guy is weak, because he keeps taking her back?
-
Both. I can maybe understand getting back together ONCE, but any more than that and there is clearly a problem that is not, and will not be getting resolved. Making both parties idiots
-
dbowles1017 - So how do you think they should fix it? Do you think it will continue to go on forever since they both can't resist each other?
-
-
I wouldn't stalk someone to intimidate them or pester them into taking me back. If someone broke up with me I'd mourn and move on and find someone who would want to be with me. I would never want to be with anyone who didn't want to be with me. I deserve more than that from him and from myself.
And if we went to see the ice capades just because I pestered him into it and then we made up I'd always wonder if he truely wanted to be with me or if it was only because I texted him 100 times and we went to the ice capades.-
Floormodel - But don't you think the guy "ex" has the issues too? Since he keeps taking her back? Why not just tell her I'm done and stop the non sense?
-
many people get themselves into a round about like that but sooner or later one of them will move on.
The guy is sending the wrong message by getting together for ice capades, but if we're discussing adults here then she needs to stop and take stock of her life and what she wants from it. There's blame on both sides but I wonder if he'd bother with her if she'd leave him alone. My guess is he'd find someone new who might be better for him than an unhealthy off and on again stalker with ice capades tickets. -
Floormodel - So why are you putting her out to be the delusional one? It sounds like to me he likes her just as much, because he wouldn't keep taking her back, he would just find someone new.
-
sounds to me like he likee the ice capades.
SHE is the one stalking by text and pestering and pressuring, so SHE is to blame for those actions. He does not control her actions. He only controls his own and since your op states
"you know each time ex breaks up with you, you know how to "reverse them" by sending 100+ text per day to win them back, and they take you back each time"
the blame falls on the stalkee for the stalking and on him for not turning down free ice capades tickets. -
Floormodel - & she doesn't control his actions for keep coming back to her either.
-
-
ah? 3 times? Get a life...-
anthony9910 - What's up? Ah? Get a life? This is just a general question, it's not me involved.
-
-
That is the dumbest sht I ever heard of... Why would anyone send 100 texts?? For ANY reason?
I'm mad I even clicked on this sht.-
lotusb - Love, etc. Sorry you feel this is a dumb situation, but many people go through this kind of stuff all the time and end up getting warped in.
-
hahah good point
-
@Ach
Just because "people" get mixed up in situations like this does not mean the situation isn't DUMB. It's a dumb situation. It's unrealistic, dumb and childish. I have adult relationships, not silly middle school text battles. -
lotusb - So if a teacher and a doctor were dating and doing this then what would you say?
-
I would say that although I respect their professions, they are extremely childish and dumb people when it comes to handling relationship matters.
Why would their profession make any difference. We all know someone can have a good job and still be an idiot...Hello? President Bush ring a bell? -
lotusb - So you think someone is childish and dumb because their engaging in actions you would not do? Maybe, just maybe these too really like each other and their both lost with stuff because of their worlds being very different, but at the sametime the chemistry is keeping them coming back to each other.
-
I think it's childish and dumb to let your emotions cloud your better judgment ALL the time. If a relationship ONLY consisted of chemistry and feelings then I'm sure these two would live happily ever after. However an ADULT know a relationship is about MUCH more than just that. And if two people can't get the other stuff right once, their not going to get it right the second and FOR SURE not the 3rd time around. Some people are just too weak to walk away from a relationship that feels good but doesn't work. They need disaster or pain to alert them when it's time to leave. This is the logic of an underdeveloped person.
-
if you have to pester and annoy someone to badger them into seeing you and then you have to go to the ice capades with them to try to keep them with you then, yes... yes yes yes ... you have issues!
stalking + pestering + badgering = not a love relationship. -
lotusb - Underdeveloped person? I'm confused? You said the girl is weak because she will not walk away, but isn't the guy weak too, since he keeps seeing her?
-
No where in that message did I signify that only one half of the couple was weak.
re-read what I wrote...I didn't even say "She" -
Floormodel - I would think the guy has the issues too since he keeps seeing her and doing "it" to make up since their chemistry and passion is uncontollable.
-
lotusb - So if they are both weak, then who wins?
-
Who wins? No one wins. It's not a game or a competition. I think it's pathetic when people waste their time like this. The person strong enough to finally walk away and stand their ground and MOVE ON is the person who at least stands a chance of actually having a life and understanding what a real relationship looks like.
-
Lotus, you might as well give up. She has an answer she wants to hear and won't accept or respect any other answer. This is the way all her threads work. She asks only wanting to hear or read one specific reply. But I can say I do agree with what you've written and I find it very interesting.
-
lotusb - So if no one wins and walks away then what?
-
Floormodel - I do listen and don't let my actions fool you with words, and all my threads don't work in a certain way either.
-
LMAO I know - I don't know why I click but I do - must be the flu screwing with my common sense LOL
-
-
It's the third time! Common, if didn't work the other two, it won't work the third...
I'm not insulting you, but maybe it's the time to end, or in your words "get out asap"-
anthony9910 - What makes you think it didn't work the other 2 times, if he keeps taking her back? Remember she knows how to "reverse him"
-
if I may Anthony,
AchE, the fact that they split up again is proof it didn't work. if it worked, they'd not have split and this situation wouldn't exist. -
Floormodel - Just because he breaks up with her and she "reverses him" then he takes her back each time, doesn't mean it didn't work the other 2 times. They both could be delusional, and the chemistry just keeps them connected.
-
@ach
Haven't they split up??? So it didn't work! -
It sounds like she's desperate and he's too nice to say "goodbye" for good.
-
anthony9910 - But doesn't split up mean for good, not on and off like this?
-
lotusb - So why are you calling her out and not him? He should just stop playing mind games with her and leave right? To me it sounds like she knows how to "reverse him" to cause him to continue to get warped in all this. He could just leave.
-
I agree AchE, I too hope the poor guy runs for the hills, changes his #, gets a protection order if he needs one, and finds a sane woman he can be with without all the stalking and weirdness!
-
Floormodel - So you don't think not once the guy is weird in all this too? Since he keeps allowing it?
-
@Ach
I think their both at fault. I didn't say taking someone back because your weak is ok. I think they should both stop their codependence and strive to be stronger people apart. -
lotusb - Codependence apart? So you think this will continue to go on and on and on with no ending?
-
If two people have begun a pattern of behaivior that causes them to think it's ok to enter into a rocky relationship (bad move) OR to think it's ok to leave a relationship when it gets tough (bad move) then how will they ever be together? Their principals are all screwed up. If you really love somone you stick it out. And on the other hand if you respect yourself you dont enter relationships with people who don't treat u right.
-
lotusb - So if they aren't treating each other right, then why do you say they are both weak for each other?
-
@ACH
YOu have a pretty nasty habit of miss quoting people. I hope you don't go into journalism. I said they are weak...not weak for each other. Treating someone right means treating them with respect, communicating your needs, listening to theirs, being honest, realistic, supportive...so on. No where in a healthy relationship is there room for games and back and forth. Let it live or let it die...zombie relationships are never good. -
copying my reply because it fits here too:
Lotus, you might as well give up. She has an answer she wants to hear and won't accept or respect any other answer. This is the way all her threads work. She asks only wanting to hear or read one specific reply. But I can say I do agree with what you've written and I find it very interesting -
@ACH
You don't have to be Holly to relate. I can relate. I was in a similar situation once.
In the 10th grade.
Thanks Floormodel....yea I'm gettin tired of thiss. -
lotusb - So if you can relate to this, because it happened in 10th grade then why are you so uptight about how I respond to your suggestions?
-
Because I said it was CHILDISH.
I was a KID when that happened to me. I was friggin 16 years old.
Hello? I'm seriously under the impression that you just SKIM people's responses and don't actually read. -
Lotus, I went through it in my early teen years too. I was lucky though, I saw the pattern as it started and decided I wanted more than bak and forth..back and forth.
As an adult I never allowed myself to be disrespected by a boyfriend or myself. I'd rather be alone than in an unhealthy relationship. -
lotusb - I do read the comments. You said you were 16 and young, but you did experience something like this and learned from it. All I'm trying to say is don't call adults who maybe dealing with stuff like this dumb and childish. Maybe they didn't get the breaks you had to where you were able to experience stuff like this as a child.
-
Floormodel - So it sounds like you too have experienced stuff like this too. Well you were fortunate enough to get the experience as a teenager. Just remember some aren't as lucky as you and lotusb and end up dealing with this kind of stuff as adults which makes it more difficult
-
"All I'm trying to say is don't call adults who maybe dealing with stuff like this dumb and childish."
Adults who choose to engage in this kind of behavior aren't "dealing with stuff like this". They're making bad choices. -
MadameX - Some adults don't choose, it just happens naturally.
-
Ach, unless someone is suffering from an extreme mental disorder, it's always a choice. No one HAS to send 100+ text messages. No one HAS to respond.
-
I think whoever this is cough cough, is damn lucky the guy hasn't looked into a protection order. Hopefully one of them will mature and see this childish behavior as nonhealthy and they will end it. Any time someone is texting an ex 100+ times to pester them into some something something it makes me sad, people deserve healthy relationships and lasting furutes.
-
-
AchE, is this woman you?
-
((Prolly))
Ooh..who said that?? -
Floormodel - No, this is just another one of my usual threads I post. I'm a little confused why you would conclude I would send 100+ text per day to a ex of mine?
-
You seem pretty upset at the answers you're getting. I'm not convinced that we aren't discussing your life and a situation you find yourself in.
As you can see, most of us agree that this is not a "relationship" that's healthy for either party. A person should want to be with you without coercion or pestering. No one should have to hassle or suffocate another into being with them and a real love realationship grows and exdpands it doesn't stop and start and stop and start with no real growth at all.
I pity both parties in your .... hypothetical... situation. Both deserve better and I hope they each find it. -
lotusb - Well it's not me and actually hollyhousewife can relate because of her brother's situation. So some can relate to this.
-
-
Sounds like my little bro and his gf. They break up at least once every 3 mos or so.I think some people will be proned to have that one person in their lives that they can't live with or without...-
HollytheHousewife - Wow so you can relate to this, or that your brother can. So how does he deal with it, and does it mess up his other dates?
-
-
Sounds like neither person is anywhere near stable enough to even think about a healthy relationship, so each of them would be wise to run in the other direction.
-
MadameX - What do you mean by neither one of them is near stable?
-
I mean that a person whose response to being left is to send more than 100 text messages is not mentally healthy, and a person who responds to that kind of out-of-control behavior positively is also not mentally healthy, and two unhealthy, compulsive people are unlikely to get together and magically form a healthy relationship.
-
MadameX - So if they both are mentally ill then I would think this will go on forever, since they are both drawn to each other with chemistry.
-
Mentally ill is a bit strong, Ach. How about dysfunctional? Unhealthy? But yes, it probably will go on until something external interrupts it--it doesn't sound likely that either will just grow up and move on.
-
MadameX- What would be an example of part of what you said "something external interrupts it" maybe he finding another woman or she finding another man?
-
-
I might have in my younger days!!!! Younger, more psycho days.-
environmentalbooty - So you don't think it's mormal for adults to be doing this?
-
I don't think it's normal for an ex to be texting her ex 100+ times because she knows if she pesters him enough she can get him to meet up with her and do "it" and get him back.. I just don't see it as normal adult behavior.
-
Floormodel - Are you saying not normal behavior on her part or including his too?
-
Also...how does one have the time to send 100 text messages? Does this person have a job? Can't they just just say, "Hey I want us to get together and talk about things. How about dinner next week?" and sit down and have a discussion instead of texting like a 12 year old?
-
AchE, so are you looking for a way to justify her texting someone, who dumped her, over 100+ times?
-
Floormodel - i'm not agreeing with her texting him 100+ times, but if she has to do whatever she has to do to get his attention then so be it.
-
lotusb - Maybe she knows he's weak and after that many text he will give into her behavior and then she's "reversed him" I don't know, I'm just assuming.
-
"...if she has to do whatever she has to do to get his attention then so be it."
So you condone a man or woman acting a complete fool in order to "get the attention" of someone they want to date?
Isn't that a little desperate?
Also....you can't "reverse" somone...and obviouslt not for long if they have broken up more than twice. I dated a man who would be on and off with his ex all the time. When they broke up she would call him constantly, sometimes while he was with me. He would take her back because he felt bad for her, but never really loved her enough to stay. A man who REALLY WANTS his woman dosen't have to be texted 100 times.... he just comes on his own. There is no pride in roping a man...because if its that easy ANY woman can take him from u. -
lotusb - No I don't condone the behavior, but if you think he will eventually think he will find another, then why does he keep coming back to her as she continues to "reverse him" he could just move on?
-
-
good lordy... it never ends LOL -
bettieblogger - Hi what never ends?
-
"it"
-
-
I just asked a male friend his opinion on this...
He said she must have some good p***y for that tactic to work.
LOL...good point I guess...-
lotusb - Well if that's true then that changes the fact she can't be that delusional, right?
-
Well she's still dating someone who only stays for the poon... thats pretty delusional.
-
lotusb - Then once again he's delusional too, for honoring everything going on between them.
-
Ach...
Either way their both idiots. Whats ur point here? -
pushing it for pussy is not "honoring".. For your saying that I must say you have never seen what the real honoring looks like
-
-
No, I wouldn't send 100+ text messages the first time, let alone a third.-
ThriftShopRomantic - Well if love and chemistry was involved then you may just change your mind.
-
No. Love for me is not persistently stalking someone. If you love someone, you respect their decisions. I wouldn't want to be involved with a guy who was iffy enough on his feelings for me that he could leave, but needed to be persuaded back. I don't have the time, personality or inclination for that kind of game playing.
-
ThriftShopRomantic - So you think the guy is game playing and is not just weak? Why did you also mention the word persuading in all this?
-
Ach..
Is English your first language?
I only ask because there seems to be a huge disconnect in translation in all your threads. -
I never said that. I don't know either of these people. I wasn't speaking about the two hypothetical or real people in the scenario. You'd asked if we, the BC community, would do that. I said I wouldn't, and I wouldn't play games.
Why do you wish us to take sides in the scenario? -
ThriftShopRomantic - You don't have to take sides in this thread, but many are letting the guy get off the hook, and not realizing he too has issues just as she.
-
Yep, Ach, they're both $%@#!!* in head. But so what? The fact that the other person is just as messed up doesn't make the first person's actions any better.
-
MadamrX- Good you agree about the guy too.
-
No I dont agree about the guy, unless it was he who was texting
-
-
ACH
Also, I remember in one of your old threads you said that you and your ex go back and forth and make up then break up and you know in your heart that your meant to be together.
Cant help but think this thread is about u.-
lotusb -Wow you think this thread is about me? I'm still dating the doctor who I met 2/5/09, so how could I have time to do all this with my ex, and keep a stable mind to run a business and etc? It's not me, period.
-
I often wonder how you keep a relationship, run a business and keep up with these pointless threads all day long....
So honestly i still think its about u.
ALSO...as I also recall there was a "hypothetical" thread posted about dating a 60 year old Dr. in which you denied the thread was about you as well...so I'm afraid your track record...not so good. -
lotusb - Then think as you please, I know it's not me and I have nothing to prove. Has it ever occurred to you I don't post all the time I went away for about a month then came back this month and posted a couple. I had gotten ideas and decided to share.
-
No.
-
lotusb - One more thing to you, why would you think I post personal stuff about me in these threads, knowing everyone see's online what I post? That wouldn't be feasible for me to do since business people associate themselves with me on a regular basis. In some threads I mentioned me to someone who specifically asked me something, other than that I have no reason to mock my personal life in these threads as future enjoyment, that wouldn't once again make since, now would it?
-
No ACH, it would NOT make sense...however very little about you makes any sense to most of us.
For example...why you would state that you don't post "personal stuff" about your life on BC when there is a whole slew of examples that contridict that... Here are a few:
www.blogcatalog.com/discuss/entry/if-you-were-33-would-you-date-a-60-year-o...
www.blogcatalog.com/discuss/entry/my-definition-of-a-perfect-man
www.blogcatalog.com/discuss/entry/the-90-day-rule-to-all-men-probation-peri...
www.blogcatalog.com/discuss/entry/brainy-men-are-better-sex-lovers -
lotusb - Well well indeed you are, to pull some of these old threads up for examples and oppose them on me. Those threads are called reverse psychology threads. It's a mixture of my analyzations and everyone else who experience stuff like this. So the conclusion from you should be why is she doing this or is she crazy or is she crafting something? I will leave it up to you my dear to figure out.
Oh and this thread is not about me, once again. -
You posted threads that were roughly based upon your life. How is that considered reverse psychology? Do you know what that term means?
It means you persuade someone to react a certain way by presenting suggestions of the opposing direction. All you did was pry opinions from BC'ers about topics that you wouldn't admit (but admitted alter) were actually about your life. -
lotusb - Living and wanting are two different things when you speak of me. I can say what I want and seek, and by me doing that doesn't mean it's about my personal life. I dont want to keep arguing about this thread with you, but just remember there is no way for someone to engage in the threads I post and keep a stable mind as I do since once again you see my background and my accomplishments.
-
What is your background and accomplishments...and how does that have to do with other people keeping a stable mind while engaging in your threads?
-
lotusb - Just go over to my websites and research my info, that's all I'm saying, and stop letting these threads trick you into thinking the opposite.
-
lotusb - I didn't mean other people keeping a stable mind, I meant me keeping a stable mind. You said these threads are about me which they aren't, and I said I wouldn't be able to keep a stable mind if I engaged in this stuff, that's all I was saying to you.
-
The opposite of what?? What the hell do your "accomplishments" (which I will NOT research, if you want me to know just say it) have to do with ANY of this??
-
Lotus, I think what she's saying is that if she were as much of a nutjob as her threads suggest, she couldn't possibly maintain a successful professional life. I think she's right--it's just that we don't actually have any way of knowing whether or not she DOES.
-
I find her behaivior to be extrememly inconsistant.
But yea your definitely right. -
lotusb - You are quite provoked with me and these threads. Just stop taking these threads so seriously, and understand it's not me, plain simple.
-
lotusb- You said: I find her behaivior to be extrememly inconsistant.
I don't quite understand? -
Ach...
Perhaps your missing the point...I (like most of everyone else here, I'm sure) takes your threads and posts EXTREMELY lightly. If I took them seriously I wouldn't respond to them at all.
The day you post something relevent and interesting beyond entertainment purposes, is the day I pass out from shock. -
lotusb - So you think I'm posting comedy, and people really aren't experiencing any of my posts I post?
-
Of course everyone who is reading and responding to them is "experiencing" them. But I would agree with Lotus that it's safe to say that no one here takes them seriously or finds value in them beyond the sort of head-shaking mild entertainment that so often goes along with disbelief.
-
lotusb - I want to ask you something. Would you find this post entertainment if you had of read it in the 10th grade? Just remember others are still experiencing my posts all the time.
-
((rolls eyes))
ACH...Yes I would find it entertainment. Because what you fail to realize, is that when I said I went though it when I was 16 I was referring to the back and forth relationships. NEVER in my 25 years of being FINE and CONFIDENT have I EVER sent a man 100 test messages to get him to come back. If a man walk away from me, there are a few more waiting to take his place. Period, and it's always been that way.
So YES, I would laugh my little 16 year old ass off at this enire thread. -
Ach, re the age issue, my daughter is thirteen and she pretty quickly gets to the point of rolling her eyes and saying "what part of 'moving on' doesn't he/she understand?" when this kind of drama ensues.
-
MadameX - Sometimes chemistry in this case can cause one to find it hard to walk away or just move on.
-
Perhaps, Ach, but so what? Lots of things in life are hard. Grownups do them anyway, when they're the right/productive/healthy/smart thing to do.
-
-
If someone sent me 100+ texts a day, I'd block their number and probably get a restraining order.-
jaybetee - I agree and I would too, but in this case it seems the guy isn't stopping her since he keeps taking her back each time.
-
-
They are not 'taking you back', they are using you for sex.
Also - It is definitely you in these threads and obviously the 'It' in this thread is sex, so therefore the 'It' in your other thread is sex, therefore my original statement about you being obsessed with sex stands true.-
crpitt - Hi once again the threads aren't about me but rather my input and reasonings that's it. I have no reason to play games, but have alot of friends who are caught in stuff like this, and she could be using him too, and "it" doesn't have to be sex but think as please. It could be meeting for dinner, a meeting to talk, or etc.
-
crpitt- forgot to add park too.
-
you're correct Cr!
what borthers me is the fine line between texting someone 100+ times to entrap them into a one nighter or a quickie and equating that with being in a relationship. Then the constant need vto blame it on the "him" as if the "her" has no personal responsiblity for her actions. Add in the posts about swords and daggers and I have to hope this is all a big joke and AchE is a 55 yr old man who retired early and just likes to play around online to get reactions.
texting someone 100+ times in order to trrap them into sex and then a "relationship" is a bit skeery. -
Floormodel- Why would my pic be of a woman, and that same pic is on various websites I use, if you think I'm a 55 year old man?
-
Ach, there are numerous men here using pictures of pretty young women as their avatars.
-
MadameX - Well like I said my pic here is on my company website and various other websites I use. It would be fraud of me to put a pic of someone else on my own websites and pretend I'm someone else, but pose as the pic.
-
-
WOW I MUST SAY I ENJOYED READING THROUGH THIS THREAD
it was a real pleasure watching a certain person make a FOOL of themselves!!!
the even funnier part was that she is totally oblivious to the fact that she sounds (like always) like an IDIOT..
Good Job Lotus for trying to hold down the fort, but as they say, CRAZY PEOPLE DONT KNOW THAT THEY ARE CRAZY....
there is no winning this one Lotus, foolio here just doesnt get it...
this post was DUMB AS HELL to begin with...
Who needs to debate if sending 100+ texts is something worth doing?
Who needs to debate if being with someone who sends those texts is worth doing?
there is no argument here!!!!! there shouldnt even be another side to this argument.
any healthy sane person will realize after text # 10, that chick is CRAZY and needs a restraining order...
and who the heck wants to "reverse" anyone? wtf does that even mean?
WEIRDO
passion/chemistry? i dont see passion OR chemistry in the fact that u have to bager someone 100 times before they are "reversed" WHAT THE HECK is this the matrix? give him the BLUE PILL!!!!!!!!help him reverse!!!!
ok im done ranting, this was a DUMB post!!!! dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb!!!!-
LMAO!!!!!
((thats my best friend))
-
RoscoeAntHillz - Thanks for your 2 cents, but like I said they are both weak for each other, since he takes her back, and she accepts, and I don't agree with you it's healthy to send 10 texts, so sounds like you maybe a little confused yourself.
-
-
Personally, I couldn't imagine myself in that kind of situation. But I also don't feel there's any right or wrong kind of relationship. Say whatever floats their boat.-
nothingprofound - How interesting of a comment
-
-
IM NOT SAYING ITS RIGHT TO SEND 10 TEXTS
im saying after 10, u know FOR SURE chick is bugged the heck out!!!
it shouldnt take 100!!!
weak for each other? these people sound like they are just WEAK IN GENERAL!!!
there is no excuse for that behavior and they should BOTH seek counseling before entering into ANY relationship!
what the hell! they shouldnt even own pets before they get help!!!!
Its obvious they both have VERY VERY low self esteem, and neither can do better......
I PITY THE FOOL!!!!-
RoscoeAntHillz - So you think they both have low self esteem, just because you don't agree with this kind of behavior? Has it ever occurred to you they may have passion/chemistry that causes them to behave this way, and because of this he takes her back and she goes back? Sometimes love causes you to do stuff, you normally wouldn't do.
-
Ach...
why dont you share your own opinion, since this isn't about u (side eye). Do YOU think its ok for two people to behave this way?? -
lotusb - No I don't agree people should behave this way, but if they don't have the experience in dealing with stuff like this from the very beginning "younger years", then they have to make these kind of mistakes to grow and learn.
-
-
oh Ach@
for my 2 cents....no problem! anytime sweetie... -
@ ach:
That's a load of ripened crap! Love does not make
U revert to childish and stupid behavior. I'm pretty
Sure love is sick of all u wackos blaming it for your
Idiot behavior. Passion and chemistry has nothing to do with
These 2 fools.
passion and chemistry makes me want to rip my fiances clothes off
Every night after work. NOT text him 100 times to make him stay with me.-
RoscoeAntHillz - So how do you not know their passion doesn't cause them to want to do the same?
-
Of course it's only you who know
-
-
Noooooo!! This could be one reason why We broke up!.100 +text..
ay ay ay ay!! -
To quote Dr Phil "And how is that working for you?"
If it was me, I would make a clean break and move on with my life.
Life is too short for so many SMS's!! LOL -
This thread is hilarious!
First of all, I don't like to receive or send text messages. If I need to communicate with someone, or they with me, I'd prefer speaking with them over the phone. After all, that's what the phone was originally invented for. Furthermore, as for sending text - if I'm ever in the mood, I have yahoo messenger for that, and when I'm tired of it, I just shut the computer down.
Lastly, after I'm done with you, or you call it quits with me, that's the end. There would be absolutely no reason for you or I to contact each other.
Add Your Comment
Login to leave a message.
