Political Discussions
Sean Hannity to be waterboarded for charity
Posted by satijournal • 4/23/09 • Subscribe to this Discussion [RSS] • Report This Topic
Topics: bush, obama, politics, rove
GRODIN: You're for torture.
HANNITY: I am for enhanced interrogation.
GRODIN: You don't believe it's torture. Have you ever been waterboarded?
HANNITY: No, but Ollie North has.
GRODIN: Would you consent to be waterboarded? We can waterboard you?
HANNITY: Sure.
GRODIN: Are you busy on Sunday?
HANNITY: I'll do it for charity. I'll let you do it. I'll do it for the troops' families.
www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/22/hannity-offers-to-be-wate_n_190354.html
Will he go through with it? I don't think so. He's too much of a coward, but if he does, I think it will prove to right wingers that waterboarding is torture. We'll see.
User Comments
-
I hope he does. Waterboarding is a big nothing.
I'll be happy to torture Grodin for real after, maybe then he'll stop bitching about getting his hair wet.
Or how about getting someone he loves and cutting their head off, just to show what the difference is between the US and the enemy. -
-
Actually I hate him because he is a bully who intentionally misinforms people to the point where they will be against their own self interest (as well as the weak and powerless) so he can can continue to extend the dominance of an ass-backwards ideology so his corporate bosses can benefit and he can collect a nice piece of change as well. He is no different than a propaganda minister working under a fascist authority only the methods are much more subtle and quite surreptitious.
-
-
-
-
I suppose it reveals my true self. I suppose any doubt that there's something wrong with me (as is with most people) is gone. But I will pay a lot of money to see Hannity waterboarded. I guess it means I'm no better than the other side of the debate, even if the people I support in the debate are right and the other side is wrong.
Waterboard Hannity (for charity). -
I took a look at Hannity's website and there was no mention of it. He's not going to go through with it, the coward. I also took a look in his forum and surprisingly, a lot of right-wingers want an investigation into our military's interrogation techniques.
-
Well he also thought it was ridiculous to make a big deal about putting a man in a box and telling him falsely of course that it was a stinging insect when it was known that he was afraid of stinging insects. We could put Hannity in a box with one of those huge Texas house spiders. I found one in my sink and the thing actually tapped my hand. It was HUGE!
-
A one off waterboarding is ok for demonstration purposes but it is not how waterboarding is used in the wild.
One guy was waterboarded 183 times in a month. Month was March so assuming 30 days and a systematic approach that means they water boarded him once every 4 hours for 30 days. www.nytimes.com/2009/04/20/world/20detain.html?_r=3&hp
Waterboarding would not have been the only technique deployed. It would have been used in conjunction with the other allowed methods.
Hanity should be subjected to a prolonged and systematic interrogation using waterboarding, slapping, cold water immersion, stress positions, high volume music, body slamming, humiliation, sleep deprivation and small cage confinement. Say for at least 30 days.
Then we will see what he says. Probably anything we want him to say, true or otherwise.-
My husband just brought up the same thing.
He suggested hat Hannity consents to a proper waterboarding experience, meaning he can be nabbed, black bagged, and interrogated as if he were a terrorist suspect, at random.
Make him and put him in an utter panic, and then ask him questions like if he was a 9/11 terrorist, or did he kill Lincoln - let's see what kind of confessions it really gets.
Add Your Comment
Login to leave a message.










