Political Discussions
What does the Constitution mean?
Posted by Agit8r • 7/21/09 • Subscribe to this Discussion [RSS] • Report This Topic
Topics: constitution, cotus, interpretation
Does it mean:
A) What the authors of 'The Federalist Papers' said that it would mean?
B) What the authors of the Constitution document itself intended
C) What everyone who signed the document intended
D) What those state legislators who sent delegates to the convention intended
E) What those who amended the Constitution intended
F) What the Supreme Court Justices interprets it to mean
G) What each of the branches of government equally interpret it to mean until checked by another by the mechanism which the constitution enumerates
User Comments
-
-
G best fits. Who knows what the authors of the document were intending if anything more than attempting to put a respectable sheen on an otherwise somewhat sordid enterprise.
That may seem a bit harsh but the fact is that the constitution has only been adhered to in a fashion that in any way reflects how it reads for the last 40 years or so. That bears the question how were they previously able to interpret the constitution in a way which allowed segregation, slavery and the virtual extermination of the native population?
So in effect it does not matter what the delegates intended the constitution to mean rather how it is interpreted at any particular point in time. Hence G. -
MOST of the Constitution is merely an agreement of intercourse between the states. The delegates primarily came together so that they could arrange for "Commercial Amity" so that governors wouldn't be flouncing around saying stupid s--- like "We beat Oklahoma"* when they exacted protectionist measures against one another.
*that dirty anti-federalist Rick Perry
Add Your Comment
Login to leave a message.




